["400px"]
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 27 ... | Lanham Act Trade DressNew baiter maker accused of artful Yellowfin's bark design, burglary barter secrets
["400px"]
Casrip 2012 u.s. trademark law introduction | Lanham Act Trade DressFrom their 17-foot baiter to their 42-foot offshore, few argosy are as characteristic as the accessible fisherman-style, center-console boats from Yellowfin.
The Bradenton-based close has been in business for 14 years, and has awash added than 1,000 vessels.
Yellowfin's boats affection a abnormally shaped bark and arduous band — which they affirmation is a “distinctive actualization that creates an all-embracing bartering consequence that boaters accept appear to apperceive and appreciate.”
In acknowledged terms, the attending and feel of a artefact — abnormally back it's anon apparent by the accessible as a specific cast — is declared as its “trade dress.”
A product's barter dress is adequate at the federal akin by the Lanham Act, the primary cast statute in the United States.
Now, Yellowfin is suing a competitor, Barker Boatworks, which was founded in 2014 by Kevin Barker, a above Yellowfin carnality president. So far, Barker Boatworks has delivered 20 boats and has orders for 50 more.
Yellowfin is alleging that Barker abandoned its barter dress rights by authoritative boats that are actual agnate to in architecture to theirs. Yellowfin additionally has accused Barker of burglary barter secrets from the aggregation breadth he formed for four years, allegations his attorneys accept denied.
Citing the litigation, Barker and Yellowfin buyer Wylie Nagler beneath to animadversion for this story.
["400px"]
Trademarks and Trade Dress; - ppt download | Lanham Act Trade DressAttorneys for Yellowfin aboriginal beatific a cease-and-desist letter to Barker in October 2014.
“It has appear to our client's absorption that afterwards you larboard Yellowfin, you set up a aggressive company, Barker Boatworks, LLC, and accept answer and marketed the accomplishment of a band of boats that infringes Yellowfin's barter dress rights,” the letter states. “As you know, Yellowfin has been accomplishment a band of boats for about 14 years that accept a audible actualization that creates an all-embracing bartering consequence that boaters accept appear to apperceive and appreciate.”
Attorneys for Barker asked if Yellowfin had conducted chump surveys to barometer whether Barker's declared contravention on Yellowfin's barter dress was apparent to the public.
In April 2015, Yellowfin responded by filing suit.
In their complaint, which alleges barter dress infringement, arbitrary antagonism and apocryphal appellation of agent beneath the Lanham Act, Yellowfin addendum that the aggregation began designing a new bark in the backward 1990s.
“All of the models allotment a abundant allotment of the arduous line, and Yellowfin has expended cogent resources, announcement and announcement its band of boats that absorb this different barter dress,” the complaint states.
Court abstracts appearance that action fishing magazines accept accounting abundant accessories about Yellowfin boats, and that fishermen and boaters accept “come to analyze the characteristic appearance of the Yellowfin Barter Dress as anecdotic the architect of the Yellowfin boats, to wit, Yellowfin.”
Barker, cloister abstracts claim, launched Barker Boatworks in 2014, and acquaint a architecture on his Facebook armpit of a 25-foot accessible fisherman-style baiter declared the “Calibogue Bay,” which Yellowfin declared abandoned their barter dress rights because of its agnate design.
["400px"]
Trademarks | Lanham Act Trade DressBarker Boatworks apparent their aboriginal assembly archetypal at baiter shows in Miami Beach and Palm Beach in February and April 2015.
“A allegory of band assets of the two boats and the accomplished boats makes it difficult to apperceive which one is bogus by Yellowfin and which one is by Defendants,” the complaint states.
In accession to trebled amercement and attorney's fees, Yellowfin is allurement the cloister to block Barker Boatworks from anarchic on their barter dress rights, and to force the defendants to anamnesis and “surrender for abolition all products, adjustment forms, amount lists, labels, advertisements, brochures, catalogs, packaging abstracts and added abstracts accumulation or assuming Plaintiff's barter dress.”
Trade secrets
Yellowfin has asked the cloister to adjustment Barker Boatworks managers to about-face over their corpuscle phones and computers for inspection, because they adduce that Barker blanket barter secrets afore abrogation the company.
“As a Carnality President, he had admission to acute aggregation information, advice that he knew Yellowfin did not allotment about and would not appetite aggregate with a competitor. Among that barter abstruse advice were (1) abundant advice about its 550 customers, and (2) abundant advice about Yellowfin's sources for apparatus and abstracts acclimated in the accomplish of its boats, including pricing,” the complaint states. “A adversary accepting that advice could ambition Yellowfin's barter and could use the antecedent advice to avoid the assignment complex in ambience up a business, anecdotic key antecedent companies, negotiating requirements contacts, negotiating appraisement for materials, etc.”
When Barker left, Yellowfin began an centralized analysis of its computer system.
“As set alternating in greater detail below, an antecedent analysis of some of the advice from that laptop computer, calm with added advice abstruse by Yellowfin apropos Mr. Barker's activities during the canicule arch up to his abandonment from Yellowfin in May 2014 and alike the canicule afterwards his departure, acknowledge that Mr. Barker did booty sensitive, proprietary and arcane advice from Yellowfin,” cloister abstracts state. “Because of that, Yellowfin approved leave to alter its complaint, which the Cloister accepted on August 31, 2015, to add a affirmation adjoin the Defendants for annexation of barter secrets.”
["400px"]
11 CLASS 6 Trademarks pt. 2; Trade Dress; Patent Law pt. 2 ... | Lanham Act Trade DressBarker's attorneys accept denied the allegations.
Expert analysis
There are three elements to prove a barter dress case:�distinctiveness, abridgement of functionality and chump confusion, says Jonathan Pollard, of Pollard PLLC, a Fort Lauderdale-based balloon advocate who focuses his convenance on antagonism law.
“Trade dress agency the all-embracing attending and feel of a product, a architecture or a actual good. The basal band is that consumers accessory this attending and feel with a accustomed brand,” said Pollard, who has all-encompassing acquaintance litigating antagonism claims, including non-compete, barter abstruse and barter dress cases.
“The best archetype of this is Red Bull. Anyone who thinks of Red Bull anon assembly its thin, argent and dejected can. Red Bull has barter dress protections.”
“Red Bull has acumen — you don't alike charge to apprehend the words on the can to apperceive what it is,” Pollard said. “The chump makes an actual connection.”
The advocate said Yellowfin's clothing avalanche somewhat abbreviate in the breadth of creating chump confusion.
“There's a big aberration amid affairs a can of Red Bull and purchasing an big-ticket boat,” he said. “When you get into the absolute of big-ticket affluence items like a baiter affairs for several hundred thousand dollars, no acute chump who has millions of dollars to absorb would absolutely be abashed amid a Yellowfin and a Barker. Nobody affairs a Barker baiter is anytime activity to say, 'Damn. I anticipation it was a Yellowfin. I was confused.'”
["400px"]
11 CLASS 6 Trademarks pt. 2; Trade Dress; Patent Law pt. 2 ... | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
Trademark and Unfair Comp. - ppt download | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
Casrip 2012 u.s. trademark law introduction | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
Update on the Law and Tactics of Product Design Trade Dress ... | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
Three Ways to Skin a Copycat: Design Patents, Trade Dress and Copyrig… | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
PPT - Law 227: Trademarks | Lanham Act Trade Dress["400px"]
Alicante presentation | Lanham Act Trade Dress